#1Just
Just
- 673 posts
- Joined: April 05
Member
Posted 24 December 2007 - 11:15
This is an extremely trivial question, but for some reason it's been bugging me for weeks now, that I've finally decided to post here and ask.
Why, in all autosport.com articles, are F1 teams considered plural? For example, one of the current headlines is "Red Bull Racing confirm '08 car launch date", as opposed to "Red Bull Racing confirms '08 car launch date".
I was always taught at uni that company names are singular, and an F1 team should surely be treated like any other company. I've also just asked my sister who's studying journalism, and she tells me the same thing. Or at least that's the case here in Australia, but I had thought that UK English was the same.
- Back to top
Advertisem*nt
#2KWSN - DSM
KWSN - DSM
- 34,463 posts
- Joined: January 03
Member
Posted 24 December 2007 - 12:07
I think it must be because it is 'a' Company launcing 'a field' of cars.
The teams may be corporations now, but the origin is 'Team DSM' car # 1 and car # 2 thereby plural cars for the single team.
I may be wrong, I have been wrong before.
- Back to top
#3bira
bira
- 13,359 posts
- Joined: November 98
Member
Posted 24 December 2007 - 12:30
Collective nouns (team, family, government, group, squad, crew, etc.) can be treated as either singular or plural - both are grammatically correct, provided you are consistent (i.e. not say my family are a bunch of nuts and is meeting tonight).
It is our style guide to treat teams as plural, given the fact that a team could never consist of one single person under any condition. At the same time, we treat a company as singular, given the fact that it is a legal entity that could be - and sometimes is - made of a single person.
It was a style choice we made many years ago, and since then have discovered it to not only be logical but also actually quite common - Reuters and the BBC, for example, follow the same guidelines.
- Back to top
#4Just
Just
- 673 posts
- Joined: April 05
Member
Posted 24 December 2007 - 12:38
Thanks for that bira. It seems it's just an Australian vs rest of the world difference - my sister's style guide that is used by journalists in Australia ("Style", published here by News Limited) says that companies are always singular. Good to know though.
- Back to top
#5mdecarle
mdecarle
- 109 posts
- Joined: April 01
Member
Posted 24 December 2007 - 13:09
In Dutch it is also singular, so it's always weird when I see it in plural in English.
On the other hand, pants are singular in Dutch too.
- Back to top
#6Rob G
Rob G
- 11,589 posts
- Joined: April 01
Member
Posted 25 December 2007 - 15:28
Originally posted by Just
It seems it's just an Australian vs rest of the world difference
Teams and companies are almost always treated grammatically as singular entities in the United States too, so you're definitely not alone.
- Back to top
#7lustigson
lustigson
- 5,864 posts
- Joined: March 01
Member
Posted 02 January 2008 - 09:31
Originally posted by mdecarle
... pants are singular in Dutch too.
That's a funny sentence.;)
- Back to top
#8ensign14
ensign14
- 60,937 posts
- Joined: December 01
Member
Posted 02 January 2008 - 10:19
Originally posted by Just
Or at least that's the case here in Australia, but I had thought that UK English was the same.
There's no hard and fast rule. I treat companies as singular, but when it comes to sports teams I think of them as a collective..."we're gonna win the league"...
- Back to top
#9lustigson
lustigson
- 5,864 posts
- Joined: March 01
Member
Posted 02 January 2008 - 10:46
Originally posted by ensign14
There's no hard and fast rule. I treat companies as singular, but when it comes to sports teams I think of them as a collective..."we're gonna win the league"...
I feel the same way:
- the Yankees will win this year's championship
- Bayern München were very succesful in the 2000s
Problem is, though, with Formula 1 teams like Toyota, Honda and Ferrari:
- Ferrari (the team) will win this season
- Ferrari (the corporation) was very succesful in the 2000s
I guess that, as long as a magazine, website or whatever maintains consistency, both forms are OK.
- Back to top
#10Risil
Risil
- 59,183 posts
- Joined: February 07
Administrator
Posted 02 January 2008 - 13:12
Toyota and Mclaren are singular, the rest are plural.
- Back to top
#11Rich
Rich
- 18,175 posts
- Joined: May 99
Member
Posted 03 January 2008 - 17:40
Originally posted by ensign14
There's no hard and fast rule. I treat companies as singular, but when it comes to sports teams I think of them as a collective..."we're gonna win the league"...
Yes, it would sound very strange to say "It is going to win the league" when referring to a team. Unless, of course, there is a strong and derisive emphasis on the "it", and you're talking about V***a.
- Back to top
#12LB
LB
- 13,515 posts
- Joined: February 01
Member
Posted 16 January 2008 - 18:19
Originally posted by ensign14
There's no hard and fast rule. I treat companies as singular, but when it comes to sports teams I think of them as a collective..."we're gonna win the league"...
Isn't that more to do with fans considering themselves part of the collective so you get what is basically Birmingham and I are going to win the league (in our dreams). If it was from my side as a non fan I would say Birmingham is going to win the league (maybe if the other 19 go bankrupt...) but since my grammer is about as good as the average two year olds I wouldn't bother listening to me anyway
- Back to top
#13Morris Dancer
Morris Dancer
- 47 posts
- Joined: December 07
Member
Posted 25 January 2008 - 14:45
Spot-on, Just, but try telling that to today's journalists, many of whom are Gen-Xers and consequently too young to have gone to school when English was taught properly.
The solutions - don't hold your breath - are to send them to a remedial English class, or employ a competent sub-editor.
- Back to top
Back to Website Feedback Forum Archive